\n\n 15.0<\/span> pts 5<\/p>\nDemonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement\/thesis statement\/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 14.0<\/span> pts 4<\/p>\nDemonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement\/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 12.0<\/span> pts 3<\/p>\nBegins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement\/thesis statement\/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 11.0<\/span> pts 2<\/p>\nDemonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement\/thesis statement\/topic statement or related contextual factors.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 9.0<\/span> pts 1<\/p>\nDemonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.0<\/span> pts 0<\/p>\nThere is no evidence of a defined statement.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n | \n 15.0<\/span> pts <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span> Analysis<\/span> PRICE-P<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n\n 25.0<\/span> pts 5<\/p>\nOrganizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 23.0<\/span> pts 4<\/p>\nOrganizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 20.0<\/span> pts 3<\/p>\nOrganizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 18.0<\/span> pts 2<\/p>\nOrganizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 15.0<\/span> pts 1<\/p>\nDescribes evidence, but it is not organized and\/ or is unrelated to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.0<\/span> pts 0<\/p>\nLists evidence, but it is not organized and\/ or is unrelated to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n | \n 25.0<\/span> pts <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span> Writing<\/span> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n\n 5.0<\/span> pts 5<\/p>\nThe paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.5<\/span> pts 4<\/p>\nThe paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.0<\/span> pts 3<\/p>\nThe paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.5<\/span> pts 2<\/p>\nThe paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.0<\/span> pts 1<\/p>\nThe paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.0<\/span> pts 0<\/p>\nThe paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5.0<\/span> pts <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span> APA<\/span> PRICE-I<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n\n 5.0<\/span> pts 5<\/p>\nThe required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.5<\/span> pts 4<\/p>\nThe required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.0<\/span> pts 3<\/p>\nThe required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.5<\/span> pts 2<\/p>\nThe required APA elements are not all included. AND\/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.0<\/span> pts 1<\/p>\nSeveral APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0.0<\/span> pts 0<\/p>\nThere is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND\/OR there are no in-text citations AND\/OR references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5.0<\/span> pts <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Total Points: 50.0 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | | | | | | | |