<\/p>\n
Assignment 1: Stories of Change<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Due Week 3 and worth 135 points<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Read the \u201cStories of Change\u201d section in Chapter 1 of the textbook that describes how companies such as Hewlett Packard, IBM, Kodak, and McDonald\u2019s have addressed significant changes within their organizations.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:<\/span><\/p>\n Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:<\/span><\/p>\n The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:<\/span><\/p>\n Grading rubric <\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Assignment 1: Stories of Change<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Criteria<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Unacceptable<\/strong> Fair<\/strong> Proficient<\/strong> Exemplary<\/strong> 1. Using Kotter\u2019s model, identify the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and describe the ramifications of those mistakes. Using Kotter\u2019s model, did not submit or incompletely identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Using Kotter\u2019s model, partially identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Using Kotter\u2019s model, satisfactorily identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Using Kotter\u2019s model, thoroughly identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 2. Make at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explain why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process. Did not submit or incompletely made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Partially made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Satisfactorily made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Thoroughly made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 3. Attribute a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provide an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate. Did not submit or incompletely attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Partially attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Satisfactorily attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Thoroughly attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 4. Recommend a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provide a justification for your recommended strategy. Did not submit or incompletely recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Partially recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Satisfactorily recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Thoroughly recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 5. 3 references No references provided<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements More than 8 errors present<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 5-6 errors present<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
Below 70% F<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
70-79% C<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
80-89% B<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n
90-100% A<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n \n
Weight: 25%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
Weight: 20%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
Weight: 20%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
Weight: 20%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
Weight: 5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
Weight: 10%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n \n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/nursingwritershelp.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/order_now.png\")
<\/a>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"