HC 205 Herzing University Unit 7 Conflict Resolution Plan

CRJ462 ASU Critique Of Gang Leader For A Day By Sudhir Venkatesh

September 21, 2021

NUR 6512 Week 4 Differential Diagnosis Skin Conditions Paper

September 21, 2021

Published by admin at September 21, 2021

Instructions

Conflict in the workplace might be inevitable, as employees have different personalities, goals, and opinions. Learning how to handle conflicts efficiently is the key to preventing it from hindering employees’ professional growth. This week, you will identify and apply an appropriate conflict resolution model to solve a real-life workplace conflict scenario.

Imagine that you were newly hired at a healthcare facility as an administrator. In your first few days at work, you came to learn that there was a major conflict occurring between employees and they had formed two opposing groups. Each side did not get along with the other and they had banded together in an “us vs. them” mentality. Furthermore, the employees involved were resistant to solving any issues and the supervisor, along with other management staff, was aware of the problem but chose not to intervene. In your first week at work, you realize that the organization has no conflict resolution policy. After bringing it to your supervisor’s notice he makes it your first assignment.

In a 2-3 page paper present an executive summary of a conflict resolution plan explaining the key steps that will be implemented to help the current conflicting parties to reach a peaceful resolution.
Your assignment must be written in standard edited English per the APA guidelines.
Be sure to support your work with at least two high-quality references, including at least one from peer-reviewed journals accessed through the Herzing University Library or other sources.
Your assignment should show the effective

application
of triangulation of content and

resources
in your conclusion and recommendations.

Rubric

HC250 – Unit 7 Assignment

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

25.0 pts

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

23.0 pts

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

20.0 pts

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

18.0 pts

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

15.0 pts

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

25.0 pts

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

23.0 pts

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

20.0 pts

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18.0 pts

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

15.0 pts

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9.0 pts

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8.0 pts

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6.0 pts

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

10.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

7.0 pts

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

6.0 pts

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 70.0

CRJ462 ASU Critique Of Gang Leader For A Day By Sudhir Venkatesh

NUR 6512 Week 4 Differential Diagnosis Skin Conditions Paper

Instructions

Rubric

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

admin

Related posts

5117

4658

5105