This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeA systematic review from the CCN Library databases was selected, identified, and was appropriate for the selected nursing change process.
|
25.0 pts
One systematic review from the CCN Library databases was identified and was clearly appropriate.
|
22.0 pts
A systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was mostly appropriate for a nursing change process.
|
20.0 pts
A systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was fairly appropriate for a nursing change process.
|
10.0 pts
A systematic review was selected, but not from the CCN Library databases and/or was not appropriate for this assignment.
|
0.0 pts
No systematic review selected or used.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 1 (Discovery) The topic, nursing practice issue, rationale and scope of the problem were clearly identified and described.
|
25.0 pts
Star Point 1 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
|
22.0 pts
Star Point 1 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.
|
20.0 pts
Star Point 1 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
|
10.0 pts
Star Point 1 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
|
0.0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 1 was not completed.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 2 (Summary) The NURSING practice problem, NURSING related PICOT question, Cochrane systematic review, and other optional references, evidence summary, strength, and solutions, are listed and described.
|
35.0 pts
Star Point 2 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
|
31.0 pts
Star Point 2 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.
|
28.0 pts
Star Point 2 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
|
13.0 pts
Star Point 2 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. or were inappropriate.
|
0.0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 2 was not completed.
|
|
35.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 3 (Translation) Care standards, practice guidelines, or protocols; stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities; the nursing role; rationale for including certain stakeholders, and cost analysis plan are addressed.
|
35.0 pts
Star Point 3 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
|
31.0 pts
Star Point 3 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.
|
28.0 pts
Star Point 3. was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
|
13.0 pts
Star Point 3 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
|
0.0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 3 was not completed.
|
|
35.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 4 (Implementation) Permission process, education plan, timeline, measurable outcomes, forms, resources, and stakeholder meetings, are addressed.
|
35.0 pts
Star Point 4 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
|
31.0 pts
Star Point 4 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed
|
28.0 pts
Star Point 4 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
|
13.0 pts
Star Point 4 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
|
0.0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 4 was not completed.
|
|
35.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 5 (Evaluation) Reporting results, process and next steps are addressed.
|
35.0 pts
Star Point 5 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
|
31.0 pts
Star Point 5 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed
|
28.0 pts
Star Point 5 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
|
13.0 pts
Star Point 5 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
|
0.0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 5 was not completed.
|
|
35.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical.
|
20.0 pts
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical throughout.
|
18.0 pts
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were mainly organized and logical throughout.
|
16.0 pts
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were somewhat organized and logical throughout.
|
8.0 pts
Information was not consistently clear and/or was not consistently organized and logical.
|
0.0 pts
Information was disorganized and difficult to understand.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe systematic review and any other scholarly resources were properly listed in APA format. The writing includes error free grammar and spelling, and complete sentence structure.
|
15.0 pts
Excellent mechanics and APA formatting with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
|
13.0 pts
Good mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column
|
12.0 pts
Fair mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column
|
6.0 pts
Poor mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column
|
0.0 pts
Very poor mechanics and formatting such that information is difficult to read.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Form Used
|
0.0 pts
0 points deducted
Correct assignment form used
|
0.0 pts
22.5 points (10%) deducted
Incorrect form used resulting in point deduction
|
|
0.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
|
0.0 pts
0 points deducted
Submitted on time
|
0.0 pts
Not submitted on time – Point deduction
1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
|
|
0.0 pts
|
Total Points: 225.0
|